Jedi & Sith vs Religious Extremists & Religious Peacekeepers
I had an interesting conversation with my sister about one of her grad classes that got me thinking. In it they were talking about what the difference is between someone who is a religious extremist and a religious peacekeeper. They are both religious, fundamentalists, and see themselves as good people doing good for their cause. The only difference that grad class could come up with, and one that I agree with, is that the extremists are willing to sacrifice other people while peacekeepers are only sacrificing themselves.
Let me explain. Mahatma Ghandi is largely considered one of the greatest people of the 20th century. What he did for India, and the example he set for others, had an effect that changed the world. He sacrificed himself through hunger strikes and peaceful protests until the British left India. He never sacrificed anyone else, just himself to achieve his goal. He was very devout religiously as well. The people who destroyed the World Trade Center would be extremists. While they too were willing to sacrifice themselves, they were also willing to sacrifice others to achieve their goal.
One other thing is that extremists see things as "You're either with us, or against us."
It just so happens that this accurately describes Jedi and Sith from Star Wars and can be used to help explain such a complicated situation as the Middle East to a child or teen, or just someone who doesn't get it. Jedi and Sith basically believe in the same thing. They believe in an all pervasive energy in the galaxy that they call the "Force". Their training and techniques are the same and even have the same roots. They have a few small, fundamental differences. Sith believe in extremism while Jedi believe in peacekeeping. The extremists also believe in using their passions to achieve their ends, while Jedi believe in detatching oneself from their feelings. Sith believe in absolutes as well. Jedi don't.
It is interesting to note, then, that El (President Bush) has said on numerous occasions that people are either wish us or against us in the War on Terror. He is willing to sacrifice others to achieve his goals, and sees himself as a good person pursuing a good cause. Does this make him a religious extremist fighting other extremist? Perhaps. He has called this war a "crusade" which has all kinds of nuances of religion (especially Christianity) and probably scared more than a few Muslims in the world.
It's an interesting thought that gave me pause and cast the whole Star Wars Saga in a different light. The parallels between that saga and current events is...well, worth considering. Think about it.
Let me explain. Mahatma Ghandi is largely considered one of the greatest people of the 20th century. What he did for India, and the example he set for others, had an effect that changed the world. He sacrificed himself through hunger strikes and peaceful protests until the British left India. He never sacrificed anyone else, just himself to achieve his goal. He was very devout religiously as well. The people who destroyed the World Trade Center would be extremists. While they too were willing to sacrifice themselves, they were also willing to sacrifice others to achieve their goal.
One other thing is that extremists see things as "You're either with us, or against us."
It just so happens that this accurately describes Jedi and Sith from Star Wars and can be used to help explain such a complicated situation as the Middle East to a child or teen, or just someone who doesn't get it. Jedi and Sith basically believe in the same thing. They believe in an all pervasive energy in the galaxy that they call the "Force". Their training and techniques are the same and even have the same roots. They have a few small, fundamental differences. Sith believe in extremism while Jedi believe in peacekeeping. The extremists also believe in using their passions to achieve their ends, while Jedi believe in detatching oneself from their feelings. Sith believe in absolutes as well. Jedi don't.
It is interesting to note, then, that El (President Bush) has said on numerous occasions that people are either wish us or against us in the War on Terror. He is willing to sacrifice others to achieve his goals, and sees himself as a good person pursuing a good cause. Does this make him a religious extremist fighting other extremist? Perhaps. He has called this war a "crusade" which has all kinds of nuances of religion (especially Christianity) and probably scared more than a few Muslims in the world.
It's an interesting thought that gave me pause and cast the whole Star Wars Saga in a different light. The parallels between that saga and current events is...well, worth considering. Think about it.



